Pillar 3
Corporate Sustainability Strategy

SGFIN’s third pillar focuses on guiding firms toward sustainability strategies that are both economically viable and socially responsible. It develops decision frameworks, assesses supply chain impacts, and builds tools to enhance transparency in corporate and SME sustainability performance, while also analysing consumer behaviour and financial market responses to help firms align with evolving standards and drive meaningful change.

SGFIN research on corporate sustainability strategy delves into how firms embed sustainability considerations into strategy, governance and financial decision-making. It spans environmental and climate-related investments, organisational and managerial incentives, and the strategic implications of sustainability commitments, providing evidence on how corporate actions shape performance, risk management and long-term value creation in a changing economic and regulatory landscape.

Same-Race Voting Preferences in Director Elections

J. Sulaeman, and Q. Ye. (2026) Who Do You Vote For? Same-Race Voting Preferences in Director Elections. European Corporate Governance Institute – Finance Working Paper No. 872/2023, Review of Finance, accepted. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4333509

This paper highlights racial and ethnic preferences in corporate director elections. Using a comprehensive dataset of mutual fund voting records, we discover that mutual fund managers are more likely to vote for director nominees who share their racial or ethnic identity. Funds managed by White-dominated teams exhibit the strongest same-race preferences, particularly those in fund families with scarce minority representation. Same-race voting preferences have detrimental implications for the career outcomes of minority director candidates, and are associated with worse fund performance primarily when fund managers operate under weaker accountability. We investigate various potential mechanisms—including statistical discrimination, value maximization, conflicts of interest, social networks, and taste-based biases—and find that the evidence aligns most closely with a taste-based explanation for same-race preferential voting.

Closing the Sustainability Action Gap: Insights from the Singlife-SGFIN Sustainable Future Index 2026

Michael Alexander | Bhairavee Wagh | Asda J Pandiangan | Weina Zhang | Ko Wen Chia | Adriana Chia

2026

The Singlife-SGFIN Sustainable Future Index (SFI) 2026 assesses sustainability motivation and action among 1,500 Singaporeans using the Awareness-Knowledge-Ownership-Action (AKOA) framework. The Index records an overall action score of 56 out of 100, revealing a gap between intention and everyday sustainable behaviour. Adoption varies across generations and sustainability areas, while Ownership, reflecting personal responsibility, values, perceived impact, and costs and benefits, emerges as the strongest driver of action.

Read the Paper

Sustainability Integrated Valuation Toolkit for SMEs

Peize Li | Fanny Xueqi Or | Yash Chhabra | Beomho Kim | Yannis Yuan | Allan Loi | Weina Zhang

2026

We present a simple toolkit for sustainability reporting and integrated valuation tailored to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Singapore. The toolkit utilises the causality models that map the sustainability-related operational activities to the direct effect on company’s financial statements (“financial value”) and externalities generated (“impact value”). By systematising sustainability disclosure and impact assessment, our toolkit supports SMEs in progressing along the sustainability journey. The toolkit differs from some existing sustainability assessment frameworks/methods in three key respects. First, it incorporates an SME-oriented sustainability survey designed to streamline the data collection. Upon submission and verification of sustainability-related operational inputs, participating SMEs receive a simple and standardised sustainability statement. Second, it utilises a comprehensive set of financial proxies from the literature, government websites, well-established industry databases, and industry research to establish evidence-based linkages between operational activities and measurable impacts. Third, the integrated value statement that incorporates both financial values and impact values of the sustainability drivers can provide managerial insights for SMEs to make better decisions in sustainability initiatives.

Read the Paper

Financial Disclosures & Corporate Sustainability

Jing, C., Xu, B. & Zuo, L. (2026). Do financial disclosures affect corporate sustainability practices? Journal of Accounting & Economics, 101901, ISSN 0165-4101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2026.101901

We examine whether financial disclosures affect firm sustainability practices. Using mandatory segment reporting in the United States as the setting, we find that disclosing financial information about previously hidden segments in polluting industries reduces toxic emissions from firm plants. This effect is consistent with the notion that segment disclosures enhance monitoring of firm pollution by highlighting the financial materiality of polluting segments and drawing stakeholders’ attention to their environmental impact. The effect is stronger when the newly disclosed segments are more polluting. Disclosing firms achieve this reduction by implementing better pollution prevention practices, reducing waste generation, and increasing green innovation. Overall, our study highlights the role of mandatory financial disclosures in shaping corporate practices beyond the scope of the disclosed information.

Understanding Net Zero Commitments by Singaporean Firms

David C. Broadstock | Sean Shin | Weina Zhang | Johan Sulaeman

2026

As Singapore advances toward its national goal of net zero emissions by 2050, understanding how listed companies in Singapore are responding is critical for investors, policymakers, and businesses alike. This whitepaper provides a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment of net zero commitments made by Singapore-headquartered listed firms, based on detailed manual screening of annual and sustainability reports.

Read the Paper

Rethinking Value Creation in Building Sustainable and Regenerative Cities

Zhang, W., Or, F., Zhang, F., & Jefferson. (2025). Rethinking value creation in building sustainable and regenerative cities. Urban Solutions, 27, Centre for Liveable Cities. https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/50/4219c964-8255-4fd4-8ffa-c0c2340285f8/Issue27%20-%20Essay_Cross-System%20Relationships_Weina%20Zhang.pdf