Pillar 3
Corporate Sustainability Strategy

SGFIN’s third pillar focuses on guiding firms toward sustainability strategies that are both economically viable and socially responsible. It develops decision frameworks, assesses supply chain impacts, and builds tools to enhance transparency in corporate and SME sustainability performance, while also analysing consumer behaviour and financial market responses to help firms align with evolving standards and drive meaningful change.

SGFIN research on corporate sustainability strategy delves into how firms embed sustainability considerations into strategy, governance and financial decision-making. It spans environmental and climate-related investments, organisational and managerial incentives, and the strategic implications of sustainability commitments, providing evidence on how corporate actions shape performance, risk management and long-term value creation in a changing economic and regulatory landscape.

Understanding Net Zero Commitments by Singaporean Firms

David C. Broadstock | Sean Shin | Weina Zhang | Johan Sulaeman

2026

As Singapore advances toward its national goal of net zero emissions by 2050, understanding how listed companies in Singapore are responding is critical for investors, policymakers, and businesses alike. This whitepaper provides a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment of net zero commitments made by Singapore-headquartered listed firms, based on detailed manual screening of annual and sustainability reports.

Read the Paper

Rethinking Value Creation in Building Sustainable and Regenerative Cities

Zhang, W., Or, F., Zhang, F., & Jefferson. (2025). Rethinking value creation in building sustainable and regenerative cities. Urban Solutions, 27, Centre for Liveable Cities. https://isomer-user-content.by.gov.sg/50/4219c964-8255-4fd4-8ffa-c0c2340285f8/Issue27%20-%20Essay_Cross-System%20Relationships_Weina%20Zhang.pdf

ETS Heterogeneity & Decarbonization Outcomes

Adbi, A., Agarwal, S., & Natarajan, S. (2025). Global heterogeneity in ETS rollouts and subsequent decarbonization outcomes. Energy Economics, 132, 108921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108921

This study explores how emissions trading schemes (ETSs) worldwide influence decarbonization. It finds that while ETSs can reduce carbon intensity, emissions, and boost renewable energy adoption, their effectiveness varies across countries. Key factors include reliance on natural resource rents, economic development level, and whether ETSs are nationwide or partial. The research shows that higher ETS carbon prices strengthen emissions reductions, underscoring both the potential and limits of ETSs in driving global climate action.

Sustainable Business in Biofuels

Weina Zhang | Michael Alexander | Feimo Zhang | Fanny Xueqi Or | Jefferson | Jiaxin Zhang

2025

This whitepaper aims to support the efforts towards scaling and commercialising the biofuels in a more financially and environmentally sustainable manner, equipping stakeholders in the biofuel industry with the knowledge on key gaps and opportunities within biofuels’ business models, financing, and policy landscapes.

Read the Paper

Consumption Carbon Footprint: Country Level Data Framework

Flavia Badarinza | Johannine Enerio | Devansh Joshi | Johan Sulaeman | Sumit Agarwal

2025

This whitepaper presents a country-agnostic algorithm for estimating household and individual carbon footprints based on personal consumption baskets.

Read the Paper

Tax Policy & Household Expenditures

Agarwal, S., Ghosh, P., & Zhang, J. (2025). Tax policy transmission and household expenditures.  The Review of Economics and Statistics 2025https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01584

Using a novel scanner data and difference-in-differences strategy, we assess how consumers respond to a large-scale tax reform in India that introduces exogenous variations in tax rate changes at the product level. We show evidence of a strong and persistent spending response to tax rate changes. The response is highly asymmetrical, with consumers responding significantly more strongly to tax rate increases than to decreases. We find empirical support for both intertemporal and cross-product substitution effects: Households (1) shift consumption forward preceding a tax increase and (2) substitute one good for another and alter their relative weight in the consumption basket to avoid paying higher tax. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that consumers with more personal shopping experience exhibit stronger consumption responses. Our findings have empirical implications for the efficacy of tax policy initiatives.