Pillar 5
Tech and Data for Sustainability

SGFIN leverages AI, machine learning and advanced analytics to strengthen sustainability reporting and impact measurement. It develops models to assess how environmental and social performance influence market valuation, alongside tools that enhance transparency, comparability and data-driven decision-making across firms.

SGFIN research on technology and data for sustainability examines how advanced analytics and digital tools can accelerate sustainable finance and environmental decision-making. It highlights predictive modelling, risk assessment frameworks, integrated data platforms and scalable solutions that enhance transparency, strengthen disclosure, improve capital allocation and support measurable climate and sustainability outcomes across sectors.

Harnessing Data-Driven ESG Partnerships to Scale SME Sustainability in Asia-Pacific Region

Loi, T.S.A., and Zhang, W. (2025). Harnessing Data-Driven ESG Partnerships to Scale SME Sustainability in Asia-Pacific Region. In Best Practice Guide – For How to Modernize Sustainable Small Business Training, Advisory, & Advisory, & Capacity Building Offerings that Work (pp.24-25) [Flipbook]IFC SME finance Forum. https://online.fliphtml5.com/yywio/gxkk/#p=25

AI & Corporate Sustainability

Ong, K., Mao, R., Satapathy, R., Filho, R. S., Cambria, E., Sulaeman, J., & Mengaldo, G. (2025). Explainable natural language processing for corporate sustainability analysis, Information Fusion, 115(102726). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102726

This paper examines how the inherent complexity of sustainability leads to subjectivity in corporate sustainability assessments. It highlights that sustainability disclosures are often incomplete, ambiguous, unreliable, and highly sophisticated, making consistent evaluation challenging. Moreover, interpreting such disclosures is a resource-intensive process prone to human bias. The authors propose that Natural Language Processing (NLP) can automate parts of the sustainability analysis, improving efficiency and reducing some aspects of subjectivity. By further integrating linguistic analysis techniques with Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) capabilities, the study suggests a pathway to enhance transparency, interpretability, and reliability in sustainability assessments.

Harmonized Framework for Corporate Sustainability Evaluation

Asda Pandiangan | Saranraj Rajindran | Zhang Feimo | Johan Sulaeman

2025

This whitepaper outlines SGFIN’s Sustainability Evaluation Framework (SEF) that integrates corporate operations and value chain, strategic planning, and external validation through independent audits and adherence to global reporting standards.

Read the Paper

Improving the Integrity of Sustainability Data: Reviewing Environmental Coverage of Sustainability Data Providers

Saranraj Rajindran | Tifanny Hendratama | Johan Sulaeman

2024

This whitepaper aims to highlight the inconsistencies in underlying sustainability data that informs sustainability ratings, quantify the data gaps in Southeast Asia, and provide insights to enhance the usefulness of sustainability data for commercial, financial and research purposes.

Read the Paper

ESG Data Primer: Current Usage & Future Applications

Tifanny Hendratama | David C. Broadstock | Johan Sulaeman

2023

This whitepaper aims to clarify the fundamentals, sources, and limitations of ESG data, offering a practical introduction to help investors and researchers better understand its use, variability, and implications for responsible investing.

Read the Paper

Institutional Investors & Corporate Environmental Performance

Nofsinger, J. R., Sulaeman, J., & Varma, A. (2019). Institutional investors and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 700-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.07.012

Despite the growing interest in sustainable investments, our understanding of how various aspects of CSR affect institutional investors’ portfolios remains limited. This study provides empirical evidence supporting the notion that economic incentives play a key role in shaping institutional investors’ preferences for a company’s Environmental (E) and Social (S) performance. Utilizing institutional investors’ stock holdings data, we observed a trend where institutions tend to reduce their holdings in firms with weaker ES performance, yet they appear largely indifferent to firms with strong ES performance. This suggests that firms with significant ES weaknesses face higher downside risks, including the potential for bankruptcy or delisting from stock exchanges due to poor performance. In the case of firms with strong ES performance, we conclude the investors’ ambivalence arises from a lack of clear economic benefits associated with such performance.