The SGFIN Whitepaper Series offers research-driven insights on sustainability, ESG data, carbon footprint analysis, and impact valuation. These publications support businesses and policymakers in making informed, forward-looking decisions.

Visit this page regularly for new whitepapers and the latest thought leadership.

Sustainability Integrated Valuation Toolkit for SMEs

Peize Li | Fanny Xueqi Or | Yash Chhabra | Beomho Kim | Yannis Yuan | Allan Loi | Weina Zhang

2026

We present a simple toolkit for sustainability reporting and integrated valuation tailored to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Singapore. The toolkit utilises the causality models that map the sustainability-related operational activities to the direct effect on company’s financial statements (“financial value”) and externalities generated (“impact value”). By systematising sustainability disclosure and impact assessment, our toolkit supports SMEs in progressing along the sustainability journey. The toolkit differs from some existing sustainability assessment frameworks/methods in three key respects. First, it incorporates an SME-oriented sustainability survey designed to streamline the data collection. Upon submission and verification of sustainability-related operational inputs, participating SMEs receive a simple and standardised sustainability statement. Second, it utilises a comprehensive set of financial proxies from the literature, government websites, well-established industry databases, and industry research to establish evidence-based linkages between operational activities and measurable impacts. Third, the integrated value statement that incorporates both financial values and impact values of the sustainability drivers can provide managerial insights for SMEs to make better decisions in sustainability initiatives.

Read the Paper

On the Road to Carbon Market Integrity: Article 6.4’s Higher Standard and the Risk of Fragmentation

Desmond Tay | Michael Alexander | Johan Sulaeman

2026

With the continued challenges facing the voluntary carbon market, it is becoming an even more uphill task to meet global climate targets. At COP29, countries agreed to operationalize standards for a centralised carbon market based on the Article 6.4 mechanism of the Paris Agreement. This development has the potential to promote greater standardisation in the generation and transfer of carbon credits, providing safeguards to ensure that carbon credits meet higher quality standards. Building on SGFIN’s previous methodology for assessing the robustness of carbon crediting frameworks in promoting high-quality carbon credits, this whitepaper evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the documents that form the foundation of the Article 6.4 mechanism framework. It finds that recent developments in the UNFCCC-led framework represent significant steps toward greater carbon market integrity, but also highlight a key implementation risk: if the rules are perceived as too stringent or costly to adopt, buyers and project developers may continue to rely on alternative standards, potentially contributing to market fragmentation and confusion.

Read the Paper

Transition and Physical Climate Risks in Bank Loan Portfolios Across the Indonesian Banking System

Zhang Feimo | Sevi W. Perwitasari | Wang Chenye | Desmond Tay | Asda J. Pandiangan | Johan Sulaeman

2026

As physical risks from climate change escalate globally, financial systems face mounting climate-related vulnerabilities. Indonesia’s banking sector also faces compounding exposure. The country’s low-lying coastal geography and fossil fuel-dependent economy create dual vulnerabilities, both transitional and physical. Transition stress testing reveals that coal, oil, gas, and electricity sector borrowers face disproportionately higher default risks during volatile periods, with expected losses potentially rising 35%. Flooding poses particularly severe physical risks, threatening borrower asset values significantly. By 2060, major banks could face annual asset losses averaging 0.4% under moderate climate scenarios, and rising over 60% under severe projections. Stronger provisioning, improved capital planning, and enhanced climate risk monitoring frameworks are urgently needed.

Read the Paper

Understanding Net Zero Commitments by Singaporean Firms

David C. Broadstock | Sean Shin | Weina Zhang | Johan Sulaeman

2026

As Singapore advances toward its national goal of net zero emissions by 2050, understanding how listed companies in Singapore are responding is critical for investors, policymakers, and businesses alike. This whitepaper provides a comprehensive, evidence-based assessment of net zero commitments made by Singapore-headquartered listed firms, based on detailed manual screening of annual and sustainability reports.

Read the Paper

Farming Practices, Financing Constraints, and Trust Barriers in Indonesia’s Rice Sector

Hiswaty Hafid | Asda J Pandiangan | Johan Sulaeman

2026

This paper provides a detailed examination of the financial vulnerabilities faced by smallholder rice farmers in Indonesia. This paper presents findings from a large-scale survey of 3,030 rice-farming households, highlighting the underlying barriers to productivity, financial inclusion, and climate resilience.

Read the Paper

Sustainable Business in Biofuels

Weina Zhang | Michael Alexander | Feimo Zhang | Fanny Xueqi Or | Jefferson | Jiaxin Zhang

2025

This whitepaper aims to support the efforts towards scaling and commercialising the biofuels in a more financially and environmentally sustainable manner, equipping stakeholders in the biofuel industry with the knowledge on key gaps and opportunities within biofuels’ business models, financing, and policy landscapes.

Read the Paper

Consumption Carbon Footprint: Country Level Data Framework

Flavia Badarinza | Johannine Enerio | Devansh Joshi | Johan Sulaeman | Sumit Agarwal

2025

This whitepaper presents a country-agnostic algorithm for estimating household and individual carbon footprints based on personal consumption baskets.

Read the Paper

Harmonized Framework for Corporate Sustainability Evaluation

Asda Pandiangan | Saranraj Rajindran | Zhang Feimo | Johan Sulaeman

2025

This whitepaper outlines SGFIN’s Sustainability Evaluation Framework (SEF) that integrates corporate operations and value chain, strategic planning, and external validation through independent audits and adherence to global reporting standards.

Read the Paper

Consumption Carbon Footprint: Singapore Case Study

Flavia Badarinza | Johannine Enerio | Devansh Joshi | Johan Sulaeman | Sumit Agarwal

2025

This whitepaper aims to provide an assessment of Singapore’s household consumption carbon footprint using the country-agnostic algorithm described in the SGFIN Whitepaper “Consumption Carbon Footprint: Country Level Data Framework”. It seeks to highlight carbon impacts across income groups and consumption categories while identifying pathways for footprint reduction and opportunities for carbon labelling and value-chain decarbonization.

Read the Paper

Improving the Integrity of Sustainability Data: Reviewing Environmental Coverage of Sustainability Data Providers

Saranraj Rajindran | Tifanny Hendratama | Johan Sulaeman

2024

This whitepaper aims to highlight the inconsistencies in underlying sustainability data that informs sustainability ratings, quantify the data gaps in Southeast Asia, and provide insights to enhance the usefulness of sustainability data for commercial, financial and research purposes.

Read the Paper

Principles and Requirements for Evaluating Carbon Credit Frameworks

Desmond Tay | Michael Alexander | Syalabi Seet | Johan Sulaeman

2024

This whitepaper aims to propose a robust methodology and a set of principles and requirements to evaluate carbon credit verification frameworks. Using the methodology, we examine dominant frameworks in the global carbon market and evaluate their ability to support high quality carbon credits.

Read the Paper

Integrated Impact Valuation Framework for Green Buildings

Jefferson | Weina Zhang | Aaron Mueller | Chunyu Yang

2024

This whitepaper introduces SGFIN’s integrated impact valuation framework for green buildings: a comprehensive approach built on the harmonized impact indicators of 13 existing building certification standards and impact measurement frameworks. Our proposed framework integrates Economic, Environmental, Social, and Governance (EESG) impacts into a unified monetary assessment model, providing a better understanding of the impact values created by green buildings.

Read the Paper